EvaCodes

I am the CEO of a real estate company

Real world asset tokenization

Online Search

6-10 Employees

Platform infrastructure and development scope: build a platform that lists tokenizer assets, ensure user friendly UI/UX, smart contract integration, and ensure backend security.

Readiness to launch upon completion, user adoption, activity, future revenue

Everything was delivered professionally and on time. Communication was done via telegram, with separate chats for separate aspects of the project.

It was impressive how they all knew their roles and worked very well as a team. Nobody tried to step on each other's toes, and each team member had a certain amount of autonomy over what they specialized in.

None come to mind at the moment

I am the Marketing manager of Goodface agency

Helping tech companies turn digital experience into a scaling advantage by creating product apps, websites, and brands behind them

Other

Pricing fit our budget

2-5 Employees

Our role was the full UX/UI design: product strategy input, wireframes, the complete design system, and final high-fidelity screens across the dashboard, transaction flows, analytics views, and user account management. EvaCodes took everything from Figma to production — frontend build, backend integration with the client's data infrastructure, authentication and permissions logic, and real-time data rendering across the dashboard components. They also handled responsive behaviour across breakpoints and performance optimisation for data-heavy views. Key deliverables from their side: pixel-accurate frontend implementation, backend API integration, role-based access system, and a fully tested production build handed off to the client's internal team.

The client launched on time — which for a fintech product with compliance dependencies and stakeholder sign-offs at multiple stages is genuinely not a given. The design fidelity in the final build was higher than I've seen on comparable projects with other dev partners. When we did the final design QA pass, the correction list was short and specific — no fundamental misreads of the component logic or interaction behaviour. The client's internal team took over the codebase without significant friction, which tells you something about the quality of what was handed to them.

Working agency-to-agency is a different dynamic than working directly with a client. You need a team that respects the design process, communicates early when something is technically constrained, and doesn't make unilateral decisions that create problems for the design system down the line. EvaCodes got that. They flagged technical limitations before they became design rollbacks, kept their sprint rhythm aligned with ours, and gave us the kind of implementation visibility that let us stay useful to the client throughout — not just at handoff. Everything delivered on schedule.

Their technical depth on fintech-specific requirements was impressive. Data visualisation at scale, real-time rendering, the kind of table and chart components that have to work perfectly under live conditions — these aren't standard frontend problems. EvaCodes had clearly done this before. They made implementation decisions that protected the design intent without needing us to specify every edge case, which is the mark of a team that actually thinks about what they're building, not just how they're building it.

The task was accomplished, and the project satisfied the customer.

I am the CMO of RansomLeak

Our company is called RansomLeak (https://ransomleak.com), we provide security awareness training services

Other

2-5 Employees

The developer was fully integrated into our core engineering team, participating in our daily standups and agile sprints. The scope of work included backend API development, frontend implementation of complex interactive UI elements, building isolated integrations requested by our customers and expanding LMS functionality

The project management and overall communication were seamless. Since it was a staff augmentation model, the developer adapted to our Jira workflow, Slack communication, and sprint schedule perfectly from day one. EvaCodes ensured that all tasks assigned to their engineer were delivered strictly on time, meeting our bi-weekly sprint deadlines. Whenever we needed to pivot or reprioritize tasks due to urgent client feedback, the developer showed great flexibility and responsiveness, adjusting workloads without any friction.

What impressed us most about EvaCodes was the exceptionally high technical screening and onboarding speed. Usually, external developers require 2 to 3 weeks to fully understand a complex, niche architecture like a cybersecurity threat simulator. The engineer from EvaCodes possessed a deep understanding of modern web architectures and clean code practices, making them productive within the first 48 hours. Furthermore, the account management team at EvaCodes kept in touch regularly to monitor satisfaction, showing they genuinely care about a long-term partnership.

Honestly, there is very little to criticize. We are fully satisfied with the outcome.

I am the Growth manager of an e-commerce development agency.

We’re a boutique Shopify dev agency that partners with top-tier digital agencies and global eCommerce brands to deliver enterprise-level Shopify development and custom tech solutions

Other

2-5 Employees

The scope of work was divided into two parallel tracks. First, the backend development and integration of a non-custodial crypto payment шлюз supporting major tokens, fully compliant with Shopify’s checkout extension architecture. Second, the development of a Telegram Mini App from scratch using Tact/FunC for smart contracts on the TON blockchain, creating a seamless ""Tap-to-Earn"" loyalty mechanics for retail customers. Key deliverables included: - Production-ready smart contracts for the loyalty token (Jettons), fully audited. - A responsive, high-performance Telegram Mini App frontend and backend. - API integrations connecting the Web3 loyalty platform with the client’s existing CRM and Shopify store. - Complete technical hand-off documentation and clean repository setup.

The results completely validated our decision to partner with them. The MVP of the Telegram Mini App was delivered in just under 7 weeks, allowing our client to run beta tests ahead of schedule. Post-launch, the crypto gateway handled transactions with zero latency or security friction. Within the first month, the client saw a 14% increase in checkout completions from Web3-native users, and the Telegram app successfully onboarded over 25,000 active users in the first two weeks alone, directly boosting brand engagement.

From a delivery management perspective, working with EvaCodes was highly collaborative and transparent. We synced our Slack channels and integrated their Jira tasks into our internal tracking loop. They assigned a dedicated Tech Lead and PM who were remarkably proactive. Milestones were hit precisely on time, and when we needed to adjust the API architecture mid-sprint to accommodate an update on the client's CRM side, the team adapted overnight without pushback or delaying the final release.

What sets them apart is that they don’t just write code blindly based on a specification; they understand the broader Web3 ecosystem thoroughly. Their engineers actively challenged some of our initial assumptions regarding smart contract logic on TON, optimization of gas fees, and user onboarding flows. That level of technical proactive ownership is rare in outsource vendors and felt like a true peer-to-peer partnership.

Honestly, the engineering side was flawless. If I had to pick something, the initial discovery phase could have been slightly more condensed, as the technical deep-dive took a few extra days of alignment meetings. However, this extra upfront planning is exactly what prevented bugs during the actual sprints, so it was ultimately time well spent.

I am the Marketing Manager of YouScan

Social listening and influencer marketing software.

Referral

2-5 Employees

The engagement was consultative throughout. EvaCodes reviewed our platform architecture and flagged potential scalability concerns before they became real problems. They did a UX audit of the search and results flows — specifically looking at how a first-time user would navigate the product without guidance. They also consulted on the CMS setup for our content team and gave recommendations on performance optimisation for the AI query response times. Key deliverables: architecture review document, UX audit with prioritised recommendations, CMS setup guidance, and a performance optimisation report.

Several of their UX recommendations made it directly into the product before launch — the empty state handling, some onboarding copy decisions, and the way results are structured on mobile. The architecture feedback helped our engineers avoid a couple of decisions that would've created technical debt down the line. Hard to put a single number on consultancy, but the product that launched felt more considered than it would've been without that outside input. Our internal team moved faster because they weren't second-guessing things that had already been reviewed.

Clean and low-friction. They worked around our internal sprint rhythm rather than imposing their own, delivered feedback in structured formats our engineers could act on directly, and were responsive when we needed a quick opinion on something mid-sprint. No chasing, no vague outputs. When I needed something summarised for a non-technical stakeholder, they provided it without making it a separate request.

They consulted like people who'd actually shipped products, not like people who'd read about shipping products. The feedback was specific, prioritised, and came with reasoning — not just a list of things to fix. They also understood that our internal engineers were the ones making the final calls, and they framed everything as input rather than instruction. That kind of professional respect for the existing team made the collaboration genuinely easy.

I have nothing to add